wiki forum trac otrs blogs mailman bewelcome
Personal tools
164

SHE: Financial aspects of Hospex

From BeVolunteer Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

fees for hosting

Is it acceptable for the host to ask payment for electricity, food etc.?

Pros

  • understandable for poor hosts and longer term stays
  • the rule of 100% free hospitality excludes certain people
  • sometimes fees are asked from landlords

Cons

  • hollowing out the system of hospitality / community
  • gift economy: voluntary gifts from the guests, buying food, helping out
  • hosts asking for financial contribution should just cut down hosting to a level they can afford
  • for many cultures fees and even gifts in exchange of hospitality is offensive

consensus

Hospitality should be free.

financial relationship to corporations

'maecenas-based' sponsorship

no benefit for the company, they stay anonymous for the world

  • anonymous donations from 'problematic companies' (see below) are mostly accepted (Robin Hood is against)

advertising

  • ad-sense
    • a lot of bad ads with moral issues: profile and contact already creates dating ads
    • consensus that this is not desirable
  • affiliations (Amazon)
    • pollution of website
      • Preference options 'I accept affiliations'-Tick box
  • non-profit organizations (Amnesty International, Oxfam etc.)

sponsorhip

  • content-deal with sponsors are not common (Heineken sponsoring a hospex site demands people to write about Heineken)
  • total dependency on sponsors is problematic
    • try to be able to run the service at minimalistic level without the sponsorship money
    • 'keep the organization mean and lean'
  • ethical / moral concerns
    • sponsors in certain areas (alcohol etc. is not acceptable for muslim members)
    • sponsors famous for certain problematic practices (genetically modified food, human-rights issues, child-labour)

ownership

  • HC is owned by one private person (legal status missing)
  • CS is a type of non-profit, and some think it can be sold, but pickwick, members of the Board of Directors can not be on the payroll, but it is anyway
  • BW is run and owned by BV - non-profit, BoD cannot be on the payroll

There is a consensus that private or corporal ownership is not desired.

partnerships with foundations

  • desirable but has to be found first
    • little strings attached
    • conferences, networking needed
back to